| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Xen
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 3858
Location: Trolling WoW
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:08 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Fortuk wrote: |
I think it would be interesting if UK got provi and started something like CVA had. |
So do I, but for different reasons. U'K are not an alliance built on territorial goals, but on RP ones, our memberbase are mostly roamers who enjoy solo or small gang roams into hostile territory with the occassional big fleet fight. I am of the opinion that becoming the new CVA would radically change the alliance, and we would lose quite a few players. In escence, "didnt want those stations anyway". We'll see how this whole thing pans out, but its still far too early to be burying CVA.
_________________
Xennith [UNITY]
The only reason we dont use trinary is that the abbreviation "megatits per second" is too close to the bone for some. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sapphrine
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 145
Location: [NKB] -[UNITY] - Diplomat
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
rather obviously there has been a what if scenario thread in U'K command since this all kicked off and it has gone all over the place:
Suggestions of U'K as the new CVA
Suggestions of a fight club version of Provi (very minmatar)
Suggestions of scorched earth
Suggestions of cutting some deals
Plenty of options are possible but at this stage in the conflict is simply not worth discussing seriously. Most of the other block have yet to make their full intentions clear. There's no visibility of the full damage to CVA after repeatedly losing space. There's no visibilty of how many holders will stick with CVA as the pressure continues.
Plenty of factors are hidden and wont be visible for some time so it all just becomes speculative. The new order in Providence will not just be shaped by a couple actors.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xBlood
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 1177
Location: The Wretched
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tbh I'd like to know roughly how much isk CVA made off providence per [time period], and how much it cost them to run all pos/TCUs. The docking fees plus refining taxes must have been pretty nice
_________________
Loike/sophia cortez/Agent Argosy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raimo
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 1343
Location: Genos Occidere - HYDRA RELOADED
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sapphrine wrote: |
Suggestions of a fight club version of Provi (very minmatar)
|
If this would be what I thing it would be I would forgive U'K for burning Provi as I love(d) it ~
_________________
For ~Good Fights~, show some support or BBQ my ass
Moderated! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rumpelstilski
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 1188
Location: Coven - PL
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xen wrote: | | So do I, but for different reasons. U'K are not an alliance built on territorial goals, but on RP ones, our memberbase are mostly roamers who enjoy solo or small gang roams into hostile territory with the occassional big fleet fight. I am of the opinion that becoming the new CVA would radically change the alliance, and we would lose quite a few players. In escence, "didnt want those stations anyway". We'll see how this whole thing pans out, but its still far too early to be burying CVA. |
So, the logical question that imposes itself is, why are you grinding providence sov instead of just grinding their npcers? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xen
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 3858
Location: Trolling WoW
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Right now we are recapturing UNITY station. Where we go from there is up to our leadership, but remember that RP is going to guide a lot of decisions made rather than a desire to capture all the wonderful moons and stations in providence.
_________________
Xennith [UNITY]
The only reason we dont use trinary is that the abbreviation "megatits per second" is too close to the bone for some. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shigsy
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 3335
Location: Iyarrland - Genos
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xen wrote: | | Right now we are recapturing UNITY station. Where we go from there is up to our leadership, but remember that RP is going to guide a lot of decisions made rather than a desire to capture all the wonderful moons and stations in providence. |
wut?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sofia Roseburn
Internet Hardman
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 8116
Location: Lost in J205027; [MM-1X]
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shigsy wrote: | | Xen wrote: | | Right now we are recapturing UNITY station. Where we go from there is up to our leadership, but remember that RP is going to guide a lot of decisions made rather than a desire to capture all the wonderful moons and stations in providence. |
wut? |
Sarcasm.
_________________
| Doomed Predator wrote: | | Sofia Roseburn; quiet, well mannered librarian by day; blood crazed, psychotic demigod by night. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mistress Suffering
Joined: 21 Mar 2007
Posts: 863
Location: Einherjar Rising (CH)
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UK actually used to run some Providence stations in kind of a vaguely benevolent fashion, similar to CVA but with fewer requirements and butt kissing. They too were NRDS but with less setting your standings for you.
I don't see why this is a particularly unlikely option now if they chose to go that route again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blazde
Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 550
Location: 4S//Morsus Mihi
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's particularly unlikely because it's not 2005/06 anymore when NRDS was still relatively common (along with the whole open outposts movement). It would be cool to see though.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sapphrine
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 145
Location: [NKB] -[UNITY] - Diplomat
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
for those that seem unable to understand, i wasn't stating 4 options, we'll choose one, i was simply stating we have lots of options and not enough information to make a choice.
Dear god some of the pm's I recieve are retarded.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dodgypast
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 342
Location: Dodgy Past / TSW / Rooks and Kings
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Having seen eve mails from UK diplos they still make a big deal out of being NRDS so I suspect they'd at least try it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lowa [NSN]
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 1959
Location: NSN
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thread lacks battle reports... 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xen
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 3858
Location: Trolling WoW
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lowa [NSN] wrote: | | Thread lacks battle reports... |
Unfortunatly there is a simple reason for this. I was going to post the following battle report for today
| Quote: |
IHub destroyed, no resistance from hostiles |
But after rereading it before posting, I decided not to. We killed a freighter if that counts?
_________________
Xennith [UNITY]
The only reason we dont use trinary is that the abbreviation "megatits per second" is too close to the bone for some. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lowa [NSN]
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 1959
Location: NSN
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sadly thats what I thought. 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Memberlist
