| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TRI ARMY
Joined: 07 Sep 2008 Posts: 1698 Location: RESON, ROL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poor fags  _________________
Nut Up or Shut Up! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tyrus_Tenebros

Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 2992 Location: Providence
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Maelstrom wrote: | | Forte wrote: | | Ocularus Dothumiter wrote: | | With the low cost of C-Type MWDs why not use them as a best of both worlds scenario? |
Low cost, are you serious? They're 90-100+ mil at moment.  |
This.
I read that post and was all like score!
and then I signed in and checked contracts and was all like  | surely not the 1MN variety..... _________________
| Polysynchronicity wrote: | | need more dudes though imo |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tsaya

Joined: 01 Jan 2009 Posts: 1740 Location: Dodixie
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
faction frig mwds are cheap and well worth it
cruiser ones are also generally worth it depending on how much cpu/pg you can afford (core/gist), cap reduction modifier, and activation cost
BS are much more rare and thus are expensive |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olusegun Obasanjo
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 26 Location: CENTERAL BANK OF NIGERIA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
the only time i ever think a t2 MWD is clearly better than named MWD is on logistics. because you need the cap regen way more than you need the downside of higher activation cost
the balance is also skewed with MWD rigs, the one that increasses cycle time will make t2 better more than it makes named better |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acv
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Some gallente ships (thinking of Thorax mainly) have a bonus on cap reduction of mwd. And T2 MWD gives you a cap boost. Named might also with Gallente Cruiser V... But anything that improves the cap on a blaster boat is nice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RoemySchneider

Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1114 Location: VANIS - INIT.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| always used plain t1 because of cap boosters and not perma-MWDing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stormscion
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 208
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i like named mwd on zealot |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alexei_M
Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 329 Location: The Program / Controlled Chaos
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As per above, named and t2 MWD are useful on logistics to get cap stable.
Recently I've also found them useful on geddons while trying to get cap stable for PoS bashing fits when theres no energy transfer around.
However for anything with cap booster I generally just go for t1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gpfault

Joined: 31 Dec 2008 Posts: 217 Location: spying on PL
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you haven't noticed yet Tyrannis massively increased the drop rate of named MWDs. Naturally this crashed prices into the fucking ground so unless you care deeply about the extra cap (-17% vs -19%) there's no real reason to use T2 (or T1) anymore.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
walrus

Joined: 03 Sep 2009 Posts: 1759 Location: Grieving beginners in internet reversi
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Klausan
Joined: 28 Jun 2009 Posts: 165
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gpfault wrote: | If you haven't noticed yet Tyrannis massively increased the drop rate of named MWDs. Naturally this crashed prices into the fucking ground so unless you care deeply about the extra cap (-17% vs -19%) there's no real reason to use T2 (or T1) anymore.
|
This must be a huge hit to T2 MWD BPO owners, since they have almoust same stats as these named MWD's so they have to drop prices to compete with them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Haffrage

Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 9275
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Best named for things you plan on mwding with (99% of pvp tbh)
T2 for things you plan on not mwding with unless it's an emergency (so some of pve, e.g. gtfo ability on a cruise raven in missions or 0.0). Although, being able to run your tank a bit better while GingTFO is arguably a good thing too. _________________
B) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rudolf Miller

Joined: 13 Dec 2008 Posts: 962 Location: Initiative/ Immensea
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Increase drop rates = time for a MWD rebalance tbh (quit penalyzing my cap bro!) _________________
Forum Power IV |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|